WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
Esse mapa conceitual, produzido no IHMC CmapTools, tem a informação relacionada a: Hacking, Danny Duong, Hacking causes injury to morally significant interests therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hacktivists may be mistaken for cyberterrorists, Hacking violates nonviolence in a digital sense defeats Hacking is considered civil-disobedience if and only if it follows these five points., Protecting sensitive information such as a social security number is not morally wrong e.g. Incompatible with the right to information privacy, A morally democratic system with a body of law is largely just for a number of reasons therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers' actions are not necessarily, and often not, morally permissible, An act of civil disobedience may be nothing more than a minor inconvenice to most therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Injury to morally significant interests is always a possible result of civil disobedience, Hacking is not considered civil disobedience Defeats Hacking attacks on govt and corporate sites can be considered political activism, If unauthorized digital intusions involve a trespass on computers and networks belonging to other people, then it violates the victims' right to their physical property therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hacking violates the victims' right to their physical property, Hacking usually involves clandestine acts of disobedience defeats Hacking is considered civil-disobedience if and only if it follows these five points., Barriers to information deserve no respect Examples of justification Hackers have offered a number of arguments purporting to justify such [nonmalicious] intrusions, Hacking causes injury to morally significant interests therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Electronic civil disobedience should be punished under the full extent of the law, The moral problems of laws have not risen to some threshold of egregiousness therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers' actions are not necessarily, and often not, morally permissible, If it is morally just to assert that something is unjust, but it is not ok to deliberately and openly behave in a manner that violates the law, then a hacker's actions are not morally permissible therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers' actions are not necessarily, and often not, morally permissible, Hacking as political activism is justified Examples of justification Hackers have offered a number of arguments purporting to justify such [nonmalicious] intrusions, If hacktivism is motivated by well-supported plausible positions, then hacktivism actions are not necessarily morally permissible therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers' actions are not necessarily, and often not, morally permissible, If hackers have offered a number of arguments purporting to justify nonmalicious intrusions, then they believe that these intrusions are morally permissible therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers believe that nonmalicious intrusions are morally permissible, Hackers have offered a number of arguments purporting to justify such [nonmalicious] intrusions therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hackers believe that nonmalicious intrusions are morally permissible, If electronic civil disobedience should be punished under the full extent of the law, and if hacktivists do not make a point to accept responsibility for their actions, or claim it anonymously, then Legitimate legal systems should provide (1) an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions and (2) a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Legitimate legal systems should provide (1) an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions and (2) a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind, The point of many punitive acts of hacktivism is not clear therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hacktivists may be mistaken for cyberterrorists, Not clear that unautorized digital intrusions are necessary to increase stock of knowledge Objects Hacking increases humanity's stock of knowledge about the relevant technologies, Hacking attacks on govt and corporate sites can be considered political activism therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Hacking as political activism is justified