WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: April 2010 IPA-USMA Workshop Brainstorm on Semantic Tags, Semantic Tags associate formal meaning with Information, Analysis can produce incomplete results without Standardization and Structure of Tags, TiGR Event Types and Categories are not organized like Ontologies, Machine Reasoning about Information such as Inference, Goal of Minimizing Soldiers' Time to Enter Tags leads to a desire for alternative Sources of Tags, Dynamic Ontologies can be extended through Manual Ontology Adjustments, Human Assignment of Tags to Data similar to TiGR Event Types and Categories, Machine Reasoning about Information depends upon Standardization and Structure of Tags, Goal of Minimizing Soldiers' Time to Enter Tags is ideally No Manual Tagging, Classes of Tags should include ????, Semantic Tags are defined and organized by Ontologies, Sources of Tags include ????, Ontologies provide Standardization and Structure of Tags, Fully Automated Tagging applies to Automatic Tagging of Free Text, Level of Threat could enable Proximity Alerts: Incoming Unrelated Units Would Automatically Download Local Data, Fully Automated Tagging applies to Speech To Text Data Input, Machine Reasoning about Information such as Analysis, Biometric Data and Descriptions of Individuals could support Suspect Tracking, Uses of Semantic Tags include ????, Machine Reasoning about Information such as Queries