Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: [02a] Criticism of Other Theories, mÉëirÉÍpÉ¥ÉÉ is not just Tactile experience, ÌuÉzÉS-aÉëWûhÉqÉç is where Going near to the object helps us clearly recognize its color and shape, Buddhists advance a dialectical argument against kÉqÉï / kÉÍqÉï, not a case of the snake in rope illusion makes The experience valid and unquestionable, The experience valid and unquestionable is a mÉëirÉÍpÉ¥ÉÉ, Criticism on S-A from Buddhists, No conflicting ideas makes The experience valid and unquestionable, Going near to the object helps us clearly recognize its color and shape explains that substance is different from its qualities, Seeing an object from a distance is does not permit noticing it clearly explains that substance is different from its qualities, uÉæpÉÉÌwÉMü accept Four ultimate entities (color, taste, smell and touch), Buddhists is criticised by VD using ÌuÉzÉS-aÉëWûhÉqÉç, Criticism on S-A from Advaitin's Difference as Illusory Theory, Buddhists is criticised by VD using The experience "I touch what I have seen", mÉëirÉÍpÉ¥ÉÉ is not just Visual experience, Buddhists is criticised by VD using AÌuÉzÉS-aÉëWûhÉqÉç, Criticism on S-A from Jaina's Anekanta Theory, Criticism on S-A from Bhaskara's Bhedabheda Theory, mÉëirÉÍpÉ¥ÉÉ meaning Recognition of an Object being seen and touched, The experience "I touch what I have seen" is not a case of the snake in rope illusion, The experience "I touch what I have seen" has No conflicting ideas