Specialty Exam Results The joint fluid analysis indicates an acute injury to the stifle joint since the fluid is red in color, denoting hemarthrosis. The good mucin clot indicates the absence of joint sepsis or immune-mediated disease process in the stifle. Bacteria were not noticed in the fluid, again supporting the idea that sepsis is not the cause of the joint effusion or lameness. The fluid cellularity is slightly increased and consists mainly of neutrophils and monocytes. An acute injury incites an inflammatory response, the neutrophil being the principle acute inflammatory cell. Monocytes are present to phagocytize any debris in the joint and clear up the joint hemarthrosis. A chronic disease process in the stifle would produce clear joint fluid and show no evidence of hemorrhage. The bloodwork indicated an acute inflammatory response due to the neutrophilia. The cells damaged when the cruciate ruptured release cytokines into the joint, which attract circulating neutrophils into the area. There is a slight hypoalbuminemia that might be the result of the inflammatory response. Inflammatory mediators released by the damaged cells and neutrophils cause the blood vessels to become more permeable. These vessels are then able to leak albumin out of the circulation and into the tissues. The very slight hypocalcemia is a result of the hypoalbuminemia since some calcium is bound to albumin in the circulation. Taking into consideration the decreased albumin levels, the serum calcium is actually 10.7mg/dl and within the reference range. The radiographs show caudal joint capsular swelling and a cranial displacement of the infrapatellar fat pad. These changes indicate the presence of an effusion. The joint space under the medial femoral condyle is reduced in width due to the increased mobility of the tibia. The intact cranial cruciate acts to keep the tibia in place and prevents tibial rotation. There is no evidence of osteophytes, which indicate a more chronic condition, or bone lysis, a hallmark of joint neoplasia. The lack of bone pathology does not rule-out a cruciate rupture. Therefore, the special exam results support the hypothesis 2: acute cranial cruciate ligament injury with resulting inflammation.