Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: [02] The Concept of Substance and Attribute, assumption of non-cognisability at same time which states that Adravyam (na dravyam) requires prior knowledge of dravyam per definition, assumption of non-cognisability at same time which states that dravyam cannot be known without knowledge of its quality, dravyam cannot be known without knowledge of its quality both result in a vicious circle, Adravyam (na dravyam) requires prior knowledge of dravyam per definition both result in a vicious circle, cognizable at the same time vide all our experience for e.g. in Blue Lotus, Substance and Attribute (S-A) has Criticisms on untenability of this distinction, scope for infinite regress identifies If S-A is absolutely distinct, & unrelated, अपृथक् सिद्ध is how We comprehend when we see objects, If S-A is absolutely distinct, & related introduces 3 entities S-R-A, Substance and Attribute (S-A) are अपृथक् सिद्ध, If S-A is absolutely distinct, & unrelated then Concept of S-A is Invalidated, scope for infinite regress identifies If S-A is absolutely distinct, & related, अपृथक् सिद्ध is cognizable at the same time vide all our experience, assumption of non-cognisability at same time is met on the basis that They are content of a single perception, अपृथक् सिद्ध meaning distinct and integrally related, cognizable at the same time vide all our experience makes it undeniable, Criticisms on untenability of this distinction based on scope for infinite regress, Substance and Attribute (S-A) criticised by Buddhists, Advaitins Jainas & Bhaskara, अनवस्थ meaning Infinite Regress; Instability, Criticisms on untenability of this distinction based on assumption of non-cognisability at same time