Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: No to Land Buying, consolidation due to 1) Increases product output, deteriorate social welfare? effects 5) Reduces GDP and GNP, Long-term cons Handing over ownership To enemy/ for other purposes e.g nuclear plants, No (To buyout) ???? Long-term cons, 4)Loss of Market share Thai No (To buyout), No (To buyout) since land does not belong to Thai anymore 5) Reduces GDP and GNP, 1) Reduction in the production of rice contributed by Arable land used for bio-fuel production, Yes (To buyout) leads to 4) improved rice production, 1) Increases product output results in good for the world, 2) Loss of Sovereignty (rights) Part of Thai Saudi Arabia owns?, Arabian buyout of Thai Arable Land (From Thailand's pespective) context Background Info Recent Sharp Rise in Rice Prices, form of investment by Saudi because Saudi is 6th largest importer of rice, 4) improved rice production because Saudi has capital, owns it (full control) backed by facts Thailand allows full foreign ownership when approved by the gov, Implications poor used more % of their income on food the poor cannot afford to eat, Why? because of 2) Unsustainable Pop growth?, 1) Permanent loss of jobs for farmers & locals less manpower needed due to better technology, Arabian buyout of Thai Arable Land (From Thailand's pespective) ???? Yes (To buyout), the policy impacts Thailand, Long-term cons cause 1) Permanent loss of jobs for farmers & locals