Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: geo engineering benv2, It must be regulated properly supports If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions, You ever stop fertilizing the oceans or spraying the atmosphere or whatever Therefore ArgScheme MP The problem will rapidly return, we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must pursue two types of approaches, If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must pursue two types of approaches, If drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact, then we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, If we do not understand the natural systems, then we should not practice geo-engineering therefore MP We should not practice geo-engineering, drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, We do not understand complex natural systems therefore MP We should not practice geo-engineering, People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions supports If drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact, then we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must properly regulate solutions, And yet, the effects of geo-engineering would rarely be restricted to a single country —that is, after all, the whole point. supports If geo-engineering is to be done properly, it is to be regulated properly., Tinkering with the atmosphere or the oceans on the scale required to do this would be highly risky and extraordinarily complex. But the alternative, getting the world’s population to give up fossil fuels, is proving exceedingly hard. Geo-engineering, as it has come to be known, may be a way of buying time for the transition to a low-carbon economy to take place in an orderly manner. supports If drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact, then we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must properly regulate solutions, One is to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. supports If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions, We should not practice geo-engineering conflicts If drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact, then we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions therefore (ArgScheme MP) we must combat fears associated with the risks, Broadly, there are two types of fears. supports If we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, then we must pursue two types of approaches, allay all fears associated with the risks and properly regulate solutions, ...planetary engineering may be needed to make the Earth itself habitable by humanity, and that it may be needed in the near future. supports If drastic change is needed to reduce our environmental impact, then we must "geo-engineer" massive technology solutions that are high risk, yet high reward, Geo-engineering is to be done properly Therefore ArgScheme MP It must be regulated properly, People will realize there are technical fixes for global warming therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions