Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Hydrogen Flowers map2, Gov. Schwarzenneger predicted cars by 2010 Therefore (Argscheme: perfect analogy) With regards to claims of eminent appearance of fuel cell cars present claims are exactly alike in terms of optimism for the near future, Past claims that predicted that hydrogen fuel would be the automotive fuel of the future have not proven true Therefore (argscheme: perfect analogy) Present claims that predict hydrogen fuel will be the automotive fuel of the future will not prove true, Past claims that predicted that hydrogen fuel would be the automotive fuel of the future have not proven true Therefore (argscheme: perfect analogy) with regards to claims that hydrogen will be the automotive fuel of the future, the claims of the present are exactly the same as the claims of the past, Logistics to supply hydrogen cars were not solved and no cars were produced therefore (Argschme: perfect analogy) with regards to claims that hydrogen will be the automotive fuel of the future, the claims of the present are exactly the same as the claims of the past, therefore (Argschme: perfect anology) Supports With regards to development of a logisitcal system to supply hydrogen fuel, present claims that such systems will develop with adequate funding have the same premise that claims of the past had: the logistical problem will be solved, Gov. Schwarzenneger predicted cars by 2010 Therefore (Argscheme: perfect analogy) CACFP predicts hydrogen cars by 2020, Current fuel technologies emit more CO2 than alternatives therefore (Argscheme: Perfect Analogy) Future fuel technologies (near term) emit more CO2 than alternatives, Current fuel technologies emit more CO2 than alternatives therefore (Argscheme: Perfect Analogy) Supports, Billions were invested but amount was not enough to produce hydrogen cars ???? A couple of billion are budgeted but falls short of amount needed to produce cars (Paragraph 13 and 14), therefore (Argschme: perfect anology) ???? Investments were insufficient in the past to produce hydrogen cars and the current investment strategy is the same, Logistics to supply hydrogen cars were not solved and no cars were produced therefore (Argschme: perfect analogy) With regards to development of a logisitcal system to supply hydrogen fuel, present claims that such systems will develop with adequate funding have the same premise that claims of the past had: the logistical problem will be solved, Shell has 6 stations and BP has non (par. 11) supports Logistics to supply hydrogen cars have not been solved so no cars will be produced, Supports ???? with regards to claims that hydrogen will be the automotive fuel of the future, the claims of the present are exactly the same as the claims of the past, Supports ???? with regards to claims that hydrogen will be the automotive fuel of the future, the claims of the present are exactly the same as the claims of the past, Gov. Schwarzenneger predicted cars by 2010 Therefore (Argscheme: perfect analogy) Supports, Current fuel technologies emit more CO2 than alternatives therefore (Argscheme: Perfect Analogy) With regards to claims of environmental emissions, the claims of the past have the same problem as claims of the present as total carbon footprint does not meet zero emissions expectation, Logistics to supply hydrogen cars were not solved and no cars were produced therefore (Argschme: perfect analogy) Logistics to supply hydrogen cars have not been solved so no cars will be produced