Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Reiff & Ballin 2008, three-level typology i.e. no learning, data could be more usefully subdivided into three different categories i.e course content/process, What makes learning experiences good or bad? original findings characteristics of both good and bad learning experiences are associated with the affective domain more often than the cognitive or psychomotor domains, What makes learning experiences good or bad? original findings some data could fit into multiple domains/categories, data clustered into three learning domains i.e. affective, Reiff, M., & Ballin, A. (2008). What do adult graduate students want? Using the typology of cognitive/affective/psychomotor learning domains to explore good and bad learning experiences. Paper presented at the AERC 2008: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, St. Louis, MO. publication information Research - Mixed using "accidental data", Reiff, M., & Ballin, A. (2008). What do adult graduate students want? Using the typology of cognitive/affective/psychomotor learning domains to explore good and bad learning experiences. Paper presented at the AERC 2008: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, St. Louis, MO. important citations in the literature review Jarvis (1991), Marone & Salio (1976) conceptualized surface learning, three-level typology i.e. non-reflective learning, What makes learning experiences good or bad? original findings when cognitive or psychomotor aspects are listed by students, they are more often associated with good learning experiences, some data could fit into multiple domains/categories led to decision that data could be more usefully subdivided into three different categories, data clustered into three learning domains i.e. psychomotor, Reiff, M., & Ballin, A. (2008). What do adult graduate students want? Using the typology of cognitive/affective/psychomotor learning domains to explore good and bad learning experiences. Paper presented at the AERC 2008: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, St. Louis, MO. publication deals with What makes learning experiences good or bad?, Marone & Salio (1976) conceptualized deep learning, Jarvis (1991) posited three-level typology, data could be more usefully subdivided into three different categories i.e instructor, What makes learning experiences good or bad? revised findings data could be more usefully subdivided into three different categories, What makes learning experiences good or bad? original findings data clustered into three learning domains, issues related to use of decontextualized information that was not originally intended to be used as research data aka accidental data, Reiff, M., & Ballin, A. (2008). What do adult graduate students want? Using the typology of cognitive/affective/psychomotor learning domains to explore good and bad learning experiences. Paper presented at the AERC 2008: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, St. Louis, MO. important citations in the literature review Marone & Salio (1976)