WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Nanotechnology in Medicine Group 1 Edited, If the current policy allows products to bypass regulations which would check the cost-effectiveness of the product and there is an unequal balance in spending on healthcare, then a normative coherence approch should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be used to reduce the exploitation of public funded research., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would facilitate formal documentary links between standards and recommendations., If a normative coherence approach should be used, then it would be beneficial by assisting in the implementation of bioethics principles and to maintain public confidence in health anlaw and policymakers. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach will assist to maintain public confidence in health law and policymakers., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach could encourage incentives for public and private research institutions to concentrate mulit-disciplinary expertise forming links between science, marketing and a broad range of public and private interests in regulation., If a normative coherence approach were to be used, then it would create a link between standards and reccommendations, permit public interest disclosures, and provide a means of challenging safety risks. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would facilitate formal documentary links between standards and recommendations., High cost of technically innovative nanomedicines that offer only marginal improvements over existing. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Under the current policy there is poor confidence in government and science., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach could help government ensure through funding guidelines that researchers and their private collaborators comply with guidelines and codes of conduct ensuring research is in accordance with of bioethical and international human rights norms., If a normative coherence approach should be used, then it would be beneficial by assisting in the implementation of bioethics principles and to maintain public confidence in health anlaw and policymakers. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach would assist the policy and regulatory implementation of bioethics principles concerning the impact of life sciences on future generations., Risk of DNA damage from engineered nanoparticles in medicines that were fast track approved and aggressively marketed. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Under the current policy there is a conflict of interest in ensuring the safety of nanotechnology., Concerns of potential for rapid global spread of infectious disease render tradional barriers ineffective and necessitate international cooperation. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be used to bring about equalities in expenditure of public funds., If a normative coherence approach were to be used, then it would create a link between standards and reccommendations, permit public interest disclosures, and provide a means of challenging safety risks. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would provide health professionals, regulators, and policymakers with a means of challenging safety risks to determine on a case-by-case basis whether additional clinical trials are required for a nanomedical product., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who were previously unsuccessful with taking their concerns through established pathways., ENPs are highly reactive and mobile within the human body. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The safety of ENPs must be ensured., If a normative coherence approach would do these two things, then it would be beneficial to enhancing public confidence in government and science. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to enhancing public confidence in government and science., If the safety of ENPs must be ensured and it is unclear whether there are safety risks to exposure to ENPs, then Safety data for nanotherapeutic products needs to be gathered, analyzed, categorized, and characterized. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Safety data for nanotherapeutic products needs to be gathered, analyzed, categorized, and characterized., Exposure can occur during manufacture or use of nanotechnology in medicine and human biosecurity. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The safety of ENPs must be ensured., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach could assist policymakers with considering, developing and implementing regulatory mechanisms that will allow a proportion of public investment to be recouped from a successfully marketed product that recieved substantial public start-up funding., Under the current policy there is exploitation of public funded research. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be taken., Restrictive regulations and the imposition of constraints on the flow of information are unlikely to reduce risks of malevolent use. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be used to bring about equalities in expenditure of public funds., A normative coherence approach should be used to reduce the exploitation of public funded research. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach would be the development of an international treaty establishing global principles for transparent and accountable expert collaborations in the safety and cost-effectiveness assessment of new health technologies.