WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Final Nanotech, Public health law and policy should be shaped to reflect a greater balance between public and private goods in medicine and human biosecurity. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Global health law and policy should be made coherent with social and professional virtues supported in bioethics and international rights systems (ie normative coherence reasoning should be applied in the development of public health laws)., If the proposed normative coherence model is applied to the policy dilemma of nanotechnology and exploitation of public-funded research, then it will ensure grater emphasis on policies to allow recovery of public investment in research. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach will ensure grater emphasis on policies to allow recovery of publicinvestment in research., The proposed normative coherence model should be applied to the policy dilemma of conflicts of interest involving regulators and policymakers charged with reducing the health risks posed by human exposure to engineered nanoparticles. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would ensure greater emphasis on the precautionary principle in regulatory safety decisions., If engineered nanoparticles are highly reactive and mobile within the body and there are no effective methods for monitoring exposure risks, then policy must permit public interest disclosures. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who have previously unsuccessfully taken their concerns through established pathways in their institution., If the normative coherence model will ensure greater emphasis on the precautionary principle in regulatory safety decisions, then it must support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators and must provide a way of challenging safety risks discretions over determining whether additional clinical trails are required for a nanomedical product. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must provide health professionals, regulators, and policymakers with a way of challenging safety risks discretions over determining whether additional clinical trails are required for a nanomedical product., Restrictive regulations and the imposition of constraints on the flow of information are unlikely to reduce risks of malevolent use. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach model will ensure greater emphasis on policies to permit public interest disclosures and other strategies for ensuring public confidence in the regulatory processes., A Market State Phenomenon compromises the capacity of public health laws to effectively deliver long-term social and individual benefits from nanotechnology. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Public health law and policy should be shaped to reflect a greater balance between public and private goods in medicine and human biosecurity., Global health law and policy should be made coherent with social and professional virtues supported in bioethics and international rights systems (ie normative coherence reasoning should be applied in the development of public health laws). therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The proposed normative coherence model should be applied to the policy dilemma of nanotechnology and inequities in expenditure of public funds., A normative coherence approach would ensure greater emphasis on the precautionary principle in regulatory safety decisions. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must provide health professionals, regulators, and policymakers with a way of challenging safety risks discretions over determining whether additional clinical trails are required for a nanomedical product., If a Market State Phenomenon undermines public interests in health law and policy debates,then it compromises the capacity of public health laws to effectively deliver long-term social and individual benefits from nanotechnology. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A Market State Phenomenon compromises the capacity of public health laws to effectively deliver long-term social and individual benefits from nanotechnology., If restrictive regulations cannot reduce the risks of maleovent use, and traditional barriers are ineffective in preventing the rapid spread of infectious disease, then its necessary for the policy to ensure public confidence. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach model will ensure greater emphasis on policies to permit public interest disclosures and other strategies for ensuring public confidence in the regulatory processes., If devices have bypassed regulations, then it is necessary to have a policy for determing when additional clinical trails should be required. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must provide health professionals, regulators, and policymakers with a way of challenging safety risks discretions over determining whether additional clinical trails are required for a nanomedical product., The proposed normative coherence model should be applied to the policy dilemma of nanotechnology and public confidence in government and science. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach model will ensure greater emphasis on policies to permit public interest disclosures and other strategies for ensuring public confidence in the regulatory processes., If the normative coherence will ensure grater emphasis on policies to allow recovery of public investment in research, then it must help policymakers implement regulatory mechanisms allowing a proportion of public investment to be recouped from marketed products that recieved substantial public start-up funding. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach will help policymakers with considering, developing and implementing regulatory mechanisms that will allow a proportion of public investment to be recouped from a successfully marketed product that recieved substantial public start-up funding., The first nanomedical device approved by the FDA bypassed the requirement for clinical trials. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must provide health professionals, regulators, and policymakers with a way of challenging safety risks discretions over determining whether additional clinical trails are required for a nanomedical product., Global health law and policy should be made coherent with social and professional virtues supported in bioethics and international rights systems (ie normative coherence reasoning should be applied in the development of public health laws). therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The proposed normative coherence model should be applied to the policy dilemma of nanotechnology and public confidence in government and science., Concerns of potential for rapid global spread of infectious disease render tradional barriers ineffective and necessitate international cooperation. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach model will ensure greater emphasis on policies to permit public interest disclosures and other strategies for ensuring public confidence in the regulatory processes., Global health law and policy should be made coherent with social and professional virtues supported in bioethics and international rights systems (ie normative coherence reasoning should be applied in the development of public health laws). therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The proposed normative coherence model is applied to the policy dilemma of nanotechnology and exploitation of public-funded research., If the proposed normative coherence model is applied to the policy dilemma of conflicts of interest involving regulators and policymakers charged with reducing the health risks posed by human exposure to engineered nanoparticles, then it will ensure greater emphasis on the precautionary principle in regulatory safety decisions. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would ensure greater emphasis on the precautionary principle in regulatory safety decisions., Engineered nanoparticles are highly reactive and mobile within the body and there are no effective methods for monitoring exposure risks and attempts to publish articles highlighting the safety risks of Australian approved ENP containing sunscreen. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach must support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who have previously unsuccessfully taken their concerns through established pathways in their institution.