WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Hacktivism - Paul Spangler, If anonymous acts of civil disobedience in many ways mirrors an act of cyberterrorism, then legal systems must provide an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions, and provide a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Legal systems must provide an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions, and provide a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind., Most examples of hacktivism to not stimulate or advance a debate on the issue. (5) therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., If (1)an act is committed openly by properly motivated persons willing to accept responsibility for the act, (2)the position is a plausible one that is in play among open-minded, reasonable persons in the relevant community, (3)persons committing an act of civil disobedience are in possession of a thoughtful justification for both the position and the act, (4)the act does not result in significant damage to the interests of innocent third parties, and (5)the act is reasonably calculated to stimulate and advance debate on the issues, then the act is morally justified as civil disobediance. therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., Anonymous acts of civil disobedience in many ways mirrors an act of cyberterrorism. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Legal systems must provide an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions, and provide a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind., Present groups and individuals claiming an act of hacktivism are not willing to accept responsibility for the act. (1) therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., Hacktivists have commited acts that are far more obviously problematic from a moral point of view than the positions they seek to attack. (3) therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., Legal systems can provide these incentives and disincentives by providing punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) It is important that a legitimate legal system provide punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law., Legal systems must provide an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions, and provide a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) It is important that a legitimate legal system provide punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law., Some examples of hacktivism use an extreme position that is not plausible among open-minded persons. (2) therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., Present examples of hacktivism often cause significant harm to innocent third parties. (4) therefore (ArgScheme: modus tolens) Present examples of hacktivism are not morally justified as civil disobedience., If legal systems must provide an incentive for hacktivists to do more than just anonymously claim responsibility for their actions, and provide a significant deterrent to anonymous cyberattacks of any kind and can provide these incentives and disincentives by providing punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law, then it is important that a legitimate legal system provide punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) It is important that a legitimate legal system provide punishment of anonymous attacks to the full extent of the law.