WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Project2-final.cmap, a report issued critiquing the FDA can make no mention of the the considerable opportunities to reform features such as industry funding of the FDA, or corporate influence over assessors, that have generated recent intense scrutiny of the organization for perceived inadequacies and conflicts of interest therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) There are conflicts of Interest in ensuring safety of nanotechnology, If nanotechnology companies seek sustainability in a global market place, then they should support well- regulated markets. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Nanotechnology companies should support well- regulated markets., Nanotechnology could potentially erode confidence in government and science. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., Nanotechnology companies are seeking sustainability in the global marketplace. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Nanotechnology companies should support well- regulated markets., If the current policy cannot legally protect the public from state and corporate infrigement on their freedoms, cannot reduce the risks of maleovent use, and is ineffective in preventing privacy then normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) In a nano-surveillance-dominated society, the public is likely to have significant concerns about state and corporate infringement of bioethical and human rights principles (such as respect for individual privacy and confidentiality of information) including the extent to which they are upheld in public health law and policy., the best way of clarifying terminological definitions and standards used in differing nanotherapeutic assessments may be to strive for coherence with as wide of range of regulatory instruments as possible – not only those relevant to domestic law, but with “soft law” normative status as guidelines in other jurisdictions Supports A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., a code of conduct for industry involved with nanotechnology manufacture can readily become a form of public relations window dressing that allows industrial development to proceed in an essentially deregulated environment therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) There are conflicts of Interest in ensuring safety of nanotechnology, Restrictive regulations and the imposition of constraints on the flow of information are unlikely to reduce risks of malevolent use. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) In a nano-surveillance-dominated society, the public is likely to have significant concerns about state and corporate infringement of bioethical and human rights principles (such as respect for individual privacy and confidentiality of information) including the extent to which they are upheld in public health law and policy., If a code of conduct for industry involved with nanotechnology manufacture can readily become a form of public relations window dressing that allows industrial development to proceed in an essentially deregulated environment, then there are conflicts of interest in ensuring the safety of nanotechnology. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) There are conflicts of Interest in ensuring safety of nanotechnology, If there are potential conflicts in bioethics social responsibility principles and international rights to health, then a policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted. modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., If the nanotech industry pressures regulators to accept that its products can be valued as innovative, then that pressure is likely to downplay the role in determinations of expert assessment of evidence about cost-effectiveness. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) It is likely that there wil be pressure to downplay the role in determinations of expert assessment of evidence about cost effectiveness., It is likely that there wil be pressure to downplay the role in determinations of expert assessment of evidence about cost effectiveness. A problem for normative coherence reasoning that must be dealt with. A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., no effective methods exist for monitoring ENP exposure risks,32 and the health risks involved are potentially unique and only partially documented therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) the best way of clarifying terminological definitions and standards used in differing nanotherapeutic assessments may be to strive for coherence with as wide of range of regulatory instruments as possible – not only those relevant to domestic law, but with “soft law” normative status as guidelines in other jurisdictions, The government has a unique opportunity to provide guidelines and codes of conduct that ensure research does not promote injustice or aggression in contradiction of bioethical and internationl human rights norms. modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., Nanotechnology can lead to exploitation of public-funded research therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., There are potential conflicts in the bioethics social responsibility principle and the international right to health. modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., In a nano-surveillance-dominated society, the public is likely to have significant concerns about state and corporate infringement of bioethical and human rights principles (such as respect for individual privacy and confidentiality of information) including the extent to which they are upheld in public health law and policy. modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., If There are conflicts of Interest in ensuring the safety of nanotechnology and nanotechnology can lead to exploitation of public-funded research and nanotechnology can lead to inequities in expenditure of public funds and nanotechnology could potentially erode public confidence in government and science, then a policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., If in a nano-surveillance-dominated society, the public is likely to have significant concerns about state and corporate infringement of bioethical and human rights principles (such as respect for individual privacy and confidentiality of information) including the extent to which they are upheld in public health law and policy. then a policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted modus ponens A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted., A policy involving normative coherence reasoning should be adopted. Defined when policymakers are legally required to consistently account for norms from the systems of bioethics and international human rights