WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Richard's reasoning, doing nothing will bring Richard in much bigger trouble than informing someone defeats by counter argument if Richard wants to avoid trouble, then he should do nothing, if Richard has an ethical obligation to avoid harm, and if Richard works with Lisa, then he should inform Lisa therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard has an ethical obligation to avoid harm, radioactive substances are a serious threat. What did Paul do with radioactive materials at Lisa's bench? objects if Richard wants to avoid trouble, then he should do nothing, if Richard wants to avoid trouble, then he should do nothing therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard wants to avoid trouble, Richard works with Lisa therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard has an ethical obligation to avoid harm, if Richard has an ethical obligation to avoid harm, and if Richard works with Lisa, then he should inform Lisa therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard should inform Lisa, if Richard wants to avoid trouble, then he should do nothing therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard should do nothing, if there is at least a minimal risk that Paul put a radio- active substance at Lisa's bench, then doing nothing will bring Richard in much bigger trouble than informing someone therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) doing nothing will bring Richard in much bigger trouble than informing someone, Richard works with Lisa therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Richard should inform Lisa, there is at least a minimal risk that Paul put a radio- active substance at Lisa's bench therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) doing nothing will bring Richard in much bigger trouble than informing someone