WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Direct v Circumstantial Evidence, Witness has Personal Knowledge, Circumstantial evidence is made up of Facts in a Chain, Personal Knowledge of Facts in a Chain, Witness e.g., has seen that 1) Betty was texting while driving. 2) Betty hit Fred in the middle of the intersection. 3) The light was red after the crash., Personal Knowledge of Fact of Consequence, Relevant Evidence is either Circumstantial evidence, Direct evidence e.g., as presented by a Witness, Facts in a Chain e.g. 1) Betty was texting while driving. 2) Betty hit Fred in the middle of the intersection. 3) The light was red after the crash., Fact of Consequence e.g. Betty ran the red light., 1) Betty was texting while driving. 2) Betty hit Fred in the middle of the intersection. 3) The light was red after the crash. shows that Betty ran the red light., Facts in a Chain that prove the Fact of Consequence, Relevant Evidence is either Direct evidence, Witness e.g., has seen that Betty ran the red light.